Collection Due Process Cases Killer Guide
Frivolous Arguments In Collection Due Process Cases
The IRS replies to those frivolous positions taken in collection due process proceedings. In these cases, the IRS explains various contentious claims people make in their attempt to avoid paying the taxes they may owe.
Some Of The Most Common Arguments Used In Collection Due Process Cases
- · Invalidity of the Assessment
- · Invalidity of the Statutory Notice of Deficiency
- · Invalidity of Notice of Federal Tax Lien
- · Invalidity of Collection Due Process Notice
- · Verification Given as Required by I.R.C. § 6330(c)(1)65
- · Invalidity of Statutory Notice and Demand
- · Tax Court Authority
- · Challenges to the Authority of IRS Employees
- · Use of Unauthorized Representatives
- · No Authorization Under I.R.C. § 7401 to Bring Action
Some Of The Arguments Explained
The IRS Frivolous Arguments In Collection Due Process Cases document explains in detail contentious arguments related to collection due process cases such as: the assessment is invalid, the notice of federal tax lien or the collection due process notice being invalid.
Some taxpayers’ arguments challenge the tax court authority, the IRS employees’ authority or both. Another contentious argument that taxpayers use refers to the right to have an unauthorized representative at collection due process hearings and in court.
The IRS may consider a contentious argument a taxpayer’s claim that there is no authorization under the I.R.C & 7401 to bring action for the collection of taxes and penalties.